According to the Court, Perrino Builders and Pat Perrino “have no authority” to bring the claims against Myers in the manner they tried to bring them.
This change in the law increases the potential reward for consumers, increases the risk and stakes for corporate Goliaths, and takes away one of the key weapons corporations use to avoid liability: arbitration.
Cleveland-Area Contractor Perrino Builders Sues its Customers; Customers Respond by Seeking Sanctions for Frivolous Conduct
Dan Myers seeks sanctions against Perrino Builders and its attorneys for frivolous conduct, claiming that Perrino Builders’ requests are contrary to over a century of settled law.
In its September 8, 2016 decision, a unanimous Eighth District Court of Appeals panel handed Ohio consumers a big victory. The Court held for the first time that contractor bonds are intended to protect homeowners and consumers from harm.
Northeast Ohio Family Claims Perrino Builders and Greenwalt Architects Defrauded Them with False Measurements
By Daniel Myers For an update on this, check out this post about a sanctions motion filed by the family and their attorney. There is an old adage in construction—measure … Continue reading
There is a powerful law you could use to make a lawyer pay you when he/she attempts to collect on certain old judgments.